It is incredible how communication has changed over the past
few years and how fast this process happened. It is quite crazy to realize that
when I was born, Internet was still in the beginnings. Nowadays, we are almost
depending on Web 2.0 platforms. Facebook is my way to keep in touch with my
friends (from my home country and abroad), keep updated about news from everywhere
and about artists, companies that I follow. Google answers my questions and is
the first place to go for a general research. YouTube allows me to get to know
about artists, film makers, ballet dancers and dance companies works. Skype
allows me to don’t feel so homesick, feel closer to my family members and
friends, and now to be able to get in touch with members from this course as well.
“Spotify” allows me to share my musics, follow my favourite singers and get to
know new bands and artists. I am a loyal consumer from Amazon. After reading
the “Reader 1” I discovered that even me, who is not really into technology and
internet (I was the last one among my friends to have Facebook, Smartphone etc…
I don’t have Instagram, Snapchat, Twitter)
am actually totally part of the Web 2.0 concept and aware how this impacted my
life.
Explaining
in a simple way, Web 2.0 allows an interaction between the users of a platform
in such a way that the creator and the reader both take part, share ideas,
interact with each other and the more users access the site and add information
to it, the better it becomes. So, if in the past the information was controlled
by a certain group of editors, producers etc., this “new second-generation of
web-based communities” (Reader 1) allows an interaction,
debate and easy and accessible communication between the ones that post the
information and the ones who read the same information, through this process create
your own content, and even customize the way to share it.
The
participation of the users present at the Web 2.0 platforms brought a huge
impact on the professional networking practice. Nowadays is has become much
easier the access from the dancers to companies, directors and any news from
their work environment. To get in touch with companies sending emails, sharing pictures,
documents and video links is a common practice. And it probably made the “dance
world” even smaller. This whole new way of participation and interaction also
changed not just the dancers’ promotion but brought a huge impact as well, on
dance companies. Is possible to show and update their new performances,
projects, dancers constantly and the barriers between the company and audience
is reduced. I see many companies sharing rehearsals videos, backstage videos,
interviews with dancers, directors, choreographers, promoting new
performances…creating their Facebook pages and Twitter. The access to it achieves
a wide range of people from anywhere in the world. The audience can
collaborate, share, comment about the company. Valtysson (2010) calls this
process as “prosumer”: “These interactive and participatory aspects of new
media objects further erode the distinction between artists and audience and
offer a model which has been termed the rise of the prosumer, i.e. the consumer
is also a producer” (Valtysson 2010, p.205).
Here, at Theater Dortmund, the theater has its
own Facebook page (which belongs to all sections of the theater) and a YouTube
channel (one for the theater and one for the ballet company). Below there is
the link for the Theater Dortmund’s Facebook page and I uploaded a video
promoting “Drei Farben”, which was a new premiere of the theater this year. Soon
I will also upload the promotion video for our next premiere “Geschichten aus
dem Wiener Wald”. Is also really nice that these videos are shown at Subway and
Train Stations around the city:
Main website: www.theaterdo.de
YouTube channels:
"Drei Farben Tanz": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=howRBEwTrrg&hd=1
Because
Web 2.0 model is constantly being developed and replaced, materials are being
reused and rearranged, is necessary to be extremely careful with what is posted
at this public and so accessed place. Among the 1 billion users from Facebook,
the 800 million users from YouTube, the 58 million tweets per day - in one
second - some hundreds will have already seen or even shared the information
posted. Maturity is required from users to recognize what should be shown.
However,
even if is this whole new technology provides a revolutionary way of
communication, I think we need to reflect the limits of it. What is explained
as “collective intelligence” (Reader 1, Gruber 2007) also limits our engagement,
once it offers just what it believes we would like to see. All those internet
giants research our profile every day and limit our access to information of what
belong to our “area of interest”. So, is it the internet totally democratic?
Are we a big community or separated groups that share the same ideas and
opinions? Is a bit scary to think that, maybe, one of those internet giants
knows more about me than my family members. Debate and criticism is also
necessary for further development and I believe is necessary a balance on this
profile research. The necessity to be always connected nowadays is also
something to think about. Communication can and must be developed but we can’t
lose the sense of living the moment, interacting with physical people and respecting
yours and the others privacy.
There
are some articles about those issues and I really enjoyed this one:
This article is also nice, about “Global Audiences”: http://blog.hootsuite.com/ballet-companies-building-global-audience/
Hi Julia,
ReplyDeleteI really liked the way that you rounded off your evaluation of Reader 1, Web 2.0. Communication is so important in our lives and the internet has provided us with many ways to do this, some of which you mentioned, Skype etc. In a positive way it has made long distance communication much simpler, especially important for you I'd imagine whilst you're working away from home! A quick Skype chat is much simpler than waiting to receive a letter! But I like the importance you have placed on living for the moment and interacting with physical people. My dad may have out dated views in the sense that he can't stand text messaging (he still owns a mobile phone though!) and would prefer everyone to speak over the phone. Scary to think how communication may have changed in 10, 20 years. Will we be speaking to each other at all? Or will it all be telepathic by then?! Who knows!
Pip :)
Hey Pip ,
DeleteFor sure is scary to realize how fast the communication has changed in the past few years. Even if I am totally dependent of Internet nowadays and I text a lot with my phone , I have to say that I understand your dad`s point of view... Is rude and annoying when you sit in a table and instead of talking , people are actually checking their Facebook , sending text messages...
My dad doesn't really like Skype. He says that makes he miss me even more. He actually loves to write letters , and I love to receive them. To receive a letter is much more exciting than to receive an email...
All communication technologies are amazing but everything has a limit and appropriate way of using !
Julia xx